Donald Trump’s acquisition of a ten% federal authorities stake in Intel, a serious electronics agency, is an instance of the damaging similarities between right-wing nationalist and left-wing socialist financial insurance policies. Each favor in depth authorities management, path, and – as on this case – even possession of trade. As Cause’s Eric Boehm factors out, the concept of US authorities possession of main pc chip producers was beforehand superior by socialist Senator Bernie Sanders. Extra usually, Steven Greenhut notes, “MAGA’s ‘right-wing’ insurance policies generally appear indistinguishable from left-wing ones.” Authorities management of the economic system is central to Trump’s large imposition of recent tariffs, his immigration restrictions, and extra.

In our 2024 article “The Case In opposition to Nationalism,” my Cato Institute colleague Alex Nowrasteh define a variety of similarities between nationalist and socialist financial insurance policies, and in addition defined how they’ve frequent flaws:

Nationalists in the US and elsewhere advocate wide-ranging authorities management of the economic system, most notably within the type of industrial coverage, protectionism, and immigration restrictionism. On this respect, the nationalism of the best has a lot in frequent with the socialism of the left. It is no accident that the extra excessive early Twentieth-century nationalists, such because the Nazis and Italian fascists, explicitly sought to acceptable socialist financial insurance policies for functions of serving to their most well-liked ethnic teams, versus the extra expressly universalist goals of left-wing socialists. It shouldn’t, subsequently, be stunning that nationalist financial insurance policies have most of the similar flaws as their socialist counterparts…

Given the overlap between nationalism and socialism, it shouldn’t be stunning that their financial insurance policies have most of the similar pitfalls. Probably the most vital are data issues and perverse incentives arising from harmful concentrations of energy.

Through the mid-Twentieth century, Nobel Prize-winning economist Friedrich Hayek famously argued that socialism can not work as a result of central planners lack the data wanted to find out which items to provide and in what portions — an idea generally known as the “data drawback.” Market costs, he argued, allow producers to know the relative worth of various items and providers, and to find out how a lot customers worth their merchandise.

Nationalist financial planners, like their socialist counterparts, don’t have any method of realizing this data. In addition they don’t have any great way of figuring out which industries authorities ought to promote and the way a lot it ought to promote them….

For these causes, nationalist financial planning has produced poverty and stagnation — very like its socialist counterpart. Such had been the ends in nations like Argentina (the place nationalism wrecked one in all Latin America’s most profitable economies), Spain, and Portugal below their nationalist regimes.

As for the motivation drawback, nationalist financial coverage — like socialism — requires concentrated authorities energy. Solely thus can politicians and bureaucrats promote their favored industries, exclude international items and staff, and so forth. But authorities actors usually are not disciplined by market costs, nor are they incentivized to hunt revenue by satisfying customers like corporations within the non-public sector. They’re as a substitute guided by the calls for of political leaders and direct their energies towards pleasing state authorities, who more and more management the purse strings….

Nationalism doesn’t resolve the data or incentive issues that undermine socialism; government-dominated economies have the identical deficiencies no matter whether or not the state swears allegiance to a legendary worldwide proletariat, an ethno-cultural group, or a pacesetter who supposedly embodies its tradition and virtues… Relying on the diploma of state management of the economic system, the outcomes could embody mismanagement, cronyism, and financial ossification. Nationalism isn’t any substitute for market costs and incentives.

As Alex likes to place it, nationalism is socialism with totally different flags, and extra ethnic chauvinism.

Clearly, we’re not the primary to level out the similarities between nationalism and socialism. The good libertarian economist F.A. Hayek warned about the identical tendency in his 1960 essay “Why I’m Not a Conservative”:

[T]his nationalistic bias… regularly supplies the bridge from conservatism to
collectivism: to assume by way of “our” trade or useful resource is barely a brief step away
from demanding that these nationwide property be directed within the nationwide curiosity.

Not all conservatives are nationalistic on this method. Those that usually are not would do effectively to sentence right-wing central planning of the economic system a minimum of the left-wing model. Each are dangerous and harmful, for most of the similar causes.

Along with it similarities with socialism, nationalist ideology additionally poses some distinct risks of its personal, similar to selling ethnic bigotry and xenophobia and undermining democratic establishments in methods considerably totally different from these attribute of socialism. Nowrasteh and I cowl them in some element in different components of our article.