KYIV, Feb 18 (IPS) – U.S. President Donald Trump and his particular envoy for Ukraine and Russia, Keith Kellogg, have lately expressed confidence and optimism concerning the prospect of “ending” the conflict in Ukraine. No particulars have been made public; nevertheless, in accordance with the brand new administration’s imaginative and prescient, each side should make concessions to attain peace. But it stays unclear not solely what the proposed concessions are but in addition how precisely the US intends to steer the events to compromise.
President Trump has to date restricted himself to obscure threats to impose tariffs on non-existent Russian imports to the U.S. Normal Kellogg, for his half, has transparently hinted that Ukraine ought to abandon its unrealistic need to liberate its territory occupied by Russia.
The U.S. efforts to stress Ukraine to simply accept vital territorial losses to Russia in alternate for ending the conflict are anticipated to extend. In distinction to the varied choices mentioned on the knowledgeable stage final 12 months, the brand new Trump administration has prevented making any commitments to future safety ensures for Ukraine.
After all, it’s nonetheless potential {that a} vital a part of the U.S. proposal stays personal. Nevertheless, it’s extra probably that the plan is designed to fulfill the ambitions of Russian chief Vladimir Putin, albeit to not the maximalist extent. So, with a Trump administration, he could also be nearer than ever to getting his approach in Ukraine.
In actual fact, this proposed deal seems indistinguishable from the Chinese language-Brazilian peace plan mentioned at varied worldwide venues final 12 months. Each approaches would “freeze” the battle, giving a minimum of implicit recognition of Russia’s occupation of swathes of Ukrainian territory, in addition to a everlasting foothold from which Russia can launch future aggressions.
It’s apparent why China and Russia’s different authoritarian allies would favor this plan. However why has it discovered help within the White Home?
The overall logic is as follows: Ukraine shouldn’t be ready to liberate all of its territories within the foreseeable future (particularly not with out very pricey and politically fraught U.S. help); persevering with hostilities solely convey additional struggling; and navy actions, subsequently, ought to cease as quickly as potential.
This framework is deeply flawed and much from a good decision. Nevertheless, different choices within the present world political configuration are starting to look merely unrealistic.
If in some way it’s potential so as to add ensures in opposition to additional Russian aggression to the “Trump—Kellogg plan,” it would a minimum of look workable. Proponents of this mannequin cite the expertise of post-war Germany and North Korea.
Persuading Ukraine to surrender territorial integrity wouldn’t be simple, however it’s potential. It’s exhausting to think about what might make the Kremlin cease its troops.
It was solely final summer season that Vladimir Putin demanded that territories that Russia doesn’t de facto management be handed over to him as a situation for a ceasefire. In its personal perverse approach, that is logical – like coping with any frequent gangster, peace all the time comes at a value.
Additionally, it’s harder to think about, nevertheless, what safety commitments might be sturdy sufficient to forestall additional Russian aggression and conflict crimes. Extra exactly, what ensures would Western leaders, who’re so afraid of escalation and any trace of a direct conflict with Russia, agree to simply accept? However even when we assume {that a} resolution to those dilemmas might be discovered, we’d be required to simply accept the occupation as irreversible.
Consideration ought to, subsequently, be paid to the next facet, which is normally omitted from the evaluation: What is going on in Ukraine’s occupied territories is essentially totally different from the German state of affairs half a century in the past.
The Soviet Union didn’t deny post-war Germany’s proper to statehood (regardless of how a lot of a puppet the East German regime was), and Moscow didn’t deny the German folks’s proper to exist.
Within the case of Ukraine, nevertheless, Russia shouldn’t be merely attempting to undermine Ukrainian statehood – it’s attempting to destroy Ukraine as a nation and as a folks. Ukrainians, from the standpoint of official Kremlin ideology, are Russians who’ve forgotten that they’re Russian, and Russia should remind them of this reality.
That is enjoying out within the occupied territories, the place Russian forces are implementing a regime of pressured passportization, Russification of schooling, and the systemic persecution of any non secular communities besides those that have been forcibly annexed to the Russian Orthodox Church below the management of the Moscow Patriarchate.
The observe of “Filtration Camps,” by which a major a part of the inhabitants of the occupied territories handed, shouldn’t be with out motive so paying homage to Chinese language strategies of suppressing, or some would say, destroying the Uyghur minority.
What we’re seeing in occupied Ukraine is a basic sample of social re-education on an Orwellian stage.
The effectiveness of Russian strategies shouldn’t be underestimated. Violence, propaganda, and bribery of these able to imitate loyalty do their job. Ukrainians within the occupied territories are being changed into Russians. Those that suppose that this may be resolved as soon as peace has been negotiated are both enjoying dumb or are actually naive.
Governments which are supporting Ukraine ought to as an alternative deal with navy support in addition to on accountability for Russia’s crime of aggression and the atrocities happening in opposition to civilians.
The self-soothing phantasm that the China-Brazil plan (or ought to I say “the Trump-Kellogg” one now?) will convey peace to Ukraine is a damaging one, and people within the West — together with the U.S. administration —tempted to help this concept should get up to the results of appeasing Putin.
Ought to the battle in Ukraine be “frozen” by such an accord, all it would do is present dictators and autocrats that nationwide sovereignty and the fitting to self-determination are negotiable. In the end, this received’t present any of us any peace or consolation, however particularly not these Ukrainians pressured to stay below Russia’s yoke.
© Inter Press Service (2025) — All Rights Reserved. Unique supply: Inter Press Service
