EMILY KWONG, HOST:
Motion pictures can inform us loads about what scares us. And ever because the U.S. dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki 80 years in the past this week, the worry of nuclear struggle has reverberated throughout a long time of movie, like in the very best image winner “Oppenheimer,” in regards to the so-called father of the atomic bomb.
(SOUNDBITE OF FILM, “OPPENHEIMER”)
MATT DAMON: (As Leslie Groves) Are we saying there’s an opportunity that once we push that button, we destroy the world?
CILLIAN MURPHY: (As J. Robert Oppenheimer) Nothing…
KWONG: Whereas director Christopher Nolan turned to historical past, different filmmakers have explored the nuclear age by speculative fiction…
(SOUNDBITE OF FILM, “CRIMSON TIDE”)
DENZEL WASHINGTON: (As Ron Hunter) If we launch and we’re flawed, what’s left of Russia goes to launch at us.
KWONG: …Or science fiction.
(SOUNDBITE OF GODZILLA ROARING)
KWONG: To speak by the artwork impressed by the nuclear age, we have introduced in NPR science correspondent Geoff Brumfiel and investigations correspondent Sacha Pfeiffer. Hello, you each.
SACHA PFEIFFER, BYLINE: Hello, Geoff and Emily.
GEOFF BRUMFIEL, BYLINE: Hello there.
KWONG: A lot of this style, to me, is about making sense of horror, proper? It is about talking about unspeakable issues, of which nuclear catastrophe, for individuals who survive it, is absolutely considered one of them. And in addition simply the worry that nuclear struggle brings – it is actually psychological. So Sacha, are you able to discuss in regards to the first film you ever noticed that introduced nuclear anxiousness to your consideration?
PFEIFFER: Sure, and I wish to say that when a editor on the present requested me to hitch this dialog, it isn’t as a result of I am a specific skilled in nuclear struggle films, however he knew I used to be Gen X, and there have been quite a lot of nuclear struggle films popping out within the ’80s. And he made…
KWONG: It is a trait of your era…
PFEIFFER: (Laughter).
KWONG: …Yeah.
PFEIFFER: We had been in type of nonetheless within the grips of the Chilly Struggle. And I – it made me assume again to once I was in all probability 12 years previous, and this TV film got here out referred to as “The Day After.”
(SOUNDBITE OF FILM, “THE DAY AFTER”)
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR #1: (As character) This isn’t an train.
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR #2: (As character) Roger, perceive. Main Reinhardt, now we have an enormous assault towards the U.S. presently. ICBMs, quite a few ICBMs. Roger, perceive. Over 300 missiles inbound now.
(SOUNDBITE OF SIREN)
PFEIFFER: This was earlier than there was cable, so there have been just some stations. Many of the nation watched “The Day After.” It was mainly a nuclear holocaust film. It scared me so badly that I can bear in mind the subsequent day saying to my dad and mom, are we going to die? And, you recognize, I’ve by no means watched that film since, and it might not even be as scary as I bear in mind, however I am going to by no means know as a result of I am too scared to observe it once more. However it made me notice that I wished to return and watch some films I hadn’t seen and see how our society has wrestled with all these problems with what have we created? And are there machines extra highly effective than us? And…
KWONG: Yeah.
PFEIFFER: …Are you able to win a struggle in an period like this? So for me, this was an excellent likelihood to return and watch quite a lot of issues I hadn’t seen or rewatch some issues I had seen.
KWONG: Yeah. I am glad you introduced up “The Day After,” Sacha, as a result of this can be a movie that basically had a real-world impact on society. Geoff, are you able to discuss that?
BRUMFIEL: Yeah. Properly, Sacha was not the one one who had the pants scared off of her by this film. About 100 million People, I feel – I seemed it up – watched it on the time…
KWONG: Oh, wow.
BRUMFIEL: …As she stated. So an enormous portion of the inhabitants noticed it, together with Ronald Reagan, who truly had it privately screened a couple of month earlier than it aired. In his diary, he wrote the film was, quote, “powerfully performed and left me enormously depressed.” And it is believed that truly this was one of many elements, not the one one, however one of many causes Reagan began pushing for some nuclear arms management throughout his presidency. And it might have led partially to the signing of the 1987 Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty that restricted using nuclear missiles in Europe. Reagan actually was affected by the film, by all account.
KWONG: A film does not get extra impactful than that. I imply, that is fairly astonishing. There have been actually dozens of films impressed by nuclear struggle, nuclear worry. Geoff, you Slacked me, like, 30 of them.
(LAUGHTER)
KWONG: However what are the movies which have actually outlined the style for you each?
BRUMFIEL: So I might argue in all probability crucial and better of all of the nuclear films is “Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Discovered To Cease Worrying And Love The Bomb.”
KWONG: What a title.
(SOUNDBITE OF FILM, “DR. STRANGELOVE OR: HOW I LEARNED TO STOP WORRYING AND LOVE THE BOMB”)
PETER SELLERS: (As President Merkin Muffley) You understand how we have at all times talked about the opportunity of one thing going flawed with the bomb. The bomb, Dimitri – the hydrogen bomb.
BRUMFIEL: After which one you had me watch that I spotted I had truly seen earlier than, however the unique 1954 “Godzilla” is totally the most effective nuclear dramas, I feel, that is ever been placed on the display screen.
KWONG: Yeah, “Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Discovered To Cease Worrying And Love The Bomb” – Geoff, why do you assume that film entered the zeitgeist prefer it did?
BRUMFIEL: Properly, for individuals who have not seen “Dr. Strangelove,” it’s a tremendous film directed by Stanley Kubrick, starring Peter Sellers in a number of completely different roles. And it entails a type of weird state of affairs wherein the U.S. and the Soviet Union destroy the world by a doomsday system that is type of constructed as a type of nuclear deterrence. What makes it so nice is that it’s a farce.
(SOUNDBITE OF FILM, “DR. STRANGELOVE OR: HOW I LEARNED TO STOP WORRYING AND LOVE THE BOMB”)
SELLERS: (As President Merkin Muffley) Gents, you possibly can’t struggle in right here. That is the struggle room.
BRUMFIEL: It’s a very, very humorous film about people screwing up, mainly, and – with the assistance of machines and ending all life on the planet. Kubrick himself stated, like, they began making an attempt to make it as a drama…
KWONG: Actually?
BRUMFIEL: …However it felt so bizarre and so hilarious that they only ended up making it a comedy. And what’s fascinating is there’s one other film that got here out across the similar time referred to as “Fail Protected,” which may be very comparable however was a drama however by no means actually landed in the identical means “Strangelove” did. So I feel this can be a function of a number of the nice nuclear films is that they do not at all times type of try to play out the straight drama of a nuclear apocalypse, whether or not it is a monster, like “Godzilla,” or it is a comedy, like “Dr. Strangelove.” They type of look barely askance on the horror of nuclear struggle, and I feel that helps viewers to…
KWONG: Course of it.
BRUMFIEL: …Type of course of it.
PFEIFFER: The opposite factor that basically struck me about “Dr. Strangelove” was it’s a terribly cynical take a look at authorities and army and the individuals in energy making choices that have an effect on individuals within the discipline and the sky. However it was a reminder that for many years and a long time, now we have felt fairly cynical in regards to the decision-makers. It was a reminder of the way it parallels right now.
KWONG: I feel that that is what makes “Godzilla (1954)” so fascinating, truly, as a result of the movie – I do know it is a couple of lizard that comes out of the ocean and makes these buildings and practice automobiles appear like fashions – which they had been for the time. It was all, like, sensible results. However it’s dealing so immediately with authorities and scientist decision-making.
PFEIFFER: Sure.
KWONG: Are you able to discuss – Geoff, you watched “Godzilla (1954)”. What did you assume?
BRUMFIEL: You understand, what’s so fascinating about it’s that lots of people say “Godzilla” is a metaphor for the bomb, and…
KWONG: Proper.
BRUMFIEL: …Definitely the scenes the place it is incinerating Tokyo and killing individuals really feel that means.
KWONG: Yeah.
BRUMFIEL: However it’s additionally fascinating to me. They’re type of wrestling with these bigger points. You understand, the people in “Godzilla,” whether or not they’re the scientists or the army males – they’re at all times making the flawed determination. They’re at all times upsetting Godzilla, you recognize? And I additionally assume it is type of fascinating Godzilla is a 2-million-year-old monster that emerges from the deep and…
KWONG: Due to H-bomb testing.
BRUMFIEL: Due to…
KWONG: He was created by, like…
BRUMFIEL: Properly, he was wrested from his roost by an H-bomb check.
KWONG: That is proper. His habitat is…
PFEIFFER: (Laughter).
BRUMFIEL: His habitat.
KWONG: …Destroyed.
BRUMFIEL: And a lot of “Godzilla” focuses on the civilian expertise, on the hospitals crammed with casualties and the burning, you recognize, residence buildings. It should actually really feel as if some type of historical beast deep inside all of us has been awoken. And, you recognize, I feel that there is type of that fascinating juxtaposition as properly. The H-bomb is one thing new, and but, these fears and harmful tendencies are very previous. And that, after all – these elements of human nature are what led to those units within the first place.
KWONG: Sacha, what movie for you has outlined the style, of any we’ve not talked about or a perspective that you’ve got discovered from watching these rising up, or now?
PFEIFFER: There’s one other older film I watched for the primary time prepping for this referred to as “On The Seashore.” It got here out in 1959.
(SOUNDBITE OF FILM, “ON THE BEACH”)
FRED ASTAIRE: (As Julian Osborne) Who would ever have believed that human beings could be silly sufficient to blow themselves off the face of the Earth?
PFEIFFER: To start with, it is an opportunity to observe these nice well-known previous film stars – Gregory Peck and Ava Gardner and even Fred Astaire. And this has a very fascinating plot. Mainly, there’s been an atomic struggle. Many of the world is gone. Australia has been spared as a result of the radiation hasn’t gotten there but, however it’s making its means there. So that you see individuals wrestling with, how a lot time do now we have left? What can we do? Ought to we finish our lives preemptively, and the way? And that is going to sound unusual, however there’s additionally a love story in it. And also you see this sort of frisky, semi-risque-for-the-era relationship between Gregory Peck and Ava Gardner. So it is great performing, very refined and reflective. I really feel prefer it’s obtained all of it, and I actually loved it.
KWONG: Is there any unifying message amongst a few of these movies, or do you assume all of them land elsewhere? Sacha, what do you assume?
PFEIFFER: I feel the unifying message is, be very cautious. And generally the flicks say it is too late, and generally the flicks say there’s nonetheless hope. What do you assume, Geoff?
BRUMFIEL: Yeah. I imply, I feel that it’s – I feel additionally these films type of fulfill a necessity people have for wrestling with loss of life…
KWONG: Yeah.
BRUMFIEL: …Writ massive. I feel it is actually fascinating that type of as we left the Chilly Struggle and moved into this century, that want has been changed by a special style, which is the zombie apocalypse film. I feel that that has type of artistically changed these nuclear apocalypse films, which is type of unlucky in a means ‘trigger the menace hasn’t actually gone away.
PFEIFFER: Properly, I did discover myself questioning. You understand, we noticed a surge of those films after World Struggle II, the bombing of Japan. We noticed one other surge after Cuban missile disaster, Chilly Struggle fears. And now we’re arguably having one other heightened worry of nuclear energy.
KWONG: That is true.
PFEIFFER: However I do not know…
KWONG: Yeah.
PFEIFFER: …That we’re seeing it mirrored in our artwork but.
BRUMFIEL: Yeah. I would agree with that.
KWONG: Yeah. I imply, to speak in regards to the current second, you recognize, earlier this week, the mayor of Hiroshima, Kazumi Matsui – he marked the eightieth anniversary of the bombing, and he gave a speech imploring the world’s powers to surrender nuclear weapons, which isn’t what’s occurring. What is occurring now in right now’s – are we in one other nuclear age, Geoff? And is the worry higher in some methods, even when it isn’t but mirrored in our artwork?
BRUMFIEL: We’re completely getting ready to one other nuclear arms race, sure. China is radically increasing its nuclear arsenal. Russia is growing new sorts of weapons. The U.S. is modernizing its nuclear weapons. And we even have, you recognize, quite a lot of new nuclear powers which might be build up their stockpiles, whether or not that is India, Pakistan, you recognize, the danger of Iran going nuclear. So we’re in a period of accelerating nuclear peril, surely.
And you recognize that treaty that Reagan signed after “The Day After” – it is gone. The U.S. and Russia have gotten out of the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty, and so they’re constructing these sorts of missiles once more. Terribly harmful weapons as a result of they offer little or no warning, so individuals haven’t a lot time to react and resolve whether or not to launch nukes again.
KWONG: Properly, if that is the – properly, do you assume artwork can save us on this second? Do you assume we’ll heed the messages of those films? It is odd that films are those type of pointing an ethical compass, however…
PFEIFFER: Properly, I feel we have had so many films making an attempt to shake us into the conclusion that these are basically unwinnable wars, that if we hadn’t…
KWONG: Yeah.
PFEIFFER: …We have not gotten the message by now, I do not assume it is getting by. And perhaps we’re not seeing any extra films now as a result of there is not any warning left to provide that hasn’t been given.
KWONG: That’s NPR’s Geoff Brumfiel and Sacha Pfeiffer. Thanks a lot to you each for becoming a member of us.
PFEIFFER: You are welcome.
BRUMFIEL: Thanks.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts could differ. Transcript textual content could also be revised to appropriate errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its unique broadcast or publication. The authoritative file of NPR’s programming is the audio file.
