On 1 June, Ukraine surprised the world with an audacious assault towards Russian airbases. Utilizing low cost, small drones hid inside vans that had penetrated deep into Russian territory, Ukraine says it was capable of hit dozens of nuclear-capable strategic bombers, taking out a reported $7 billion of navy {hardware}.

The drone-smuggling assault, codenamed Operation Spiderweb, was an unbelievable feat of navy planning – however it additionally highlighted a vulnerability that has defence chiefs world wide involved that their belongings may very well be hit subsequent.

“The chance potentials of small drone assaults to US or UK air bases proper now are 100 per cent,” says Robert Bunker at US consultancy agency C/O Futures. “You merely want a bunch with the intent and functionality, which is a really low bar to beat.”

Ukraine’s safety service, the SBU, says it used 117 first-person view drones for the assault, adapting them from racing quadcopters to hold a few kilograms of explosives every. The nation produced round 1.5 million of those drones for battlefield use final 12 months, costing just some hundred {dollars} every. They’re sometimes restricted to a spread of round 20 kilometres, however as Spiderweb exhibits, they are often delivered to the goal space and flown remotely.

The assault got here as no shock to US defence analyst Zachary Kallenborn, who predicted precisely this type of risk to strategic bomber plane in a 2019 paper. “Ukraine did much more in scale and affect than I might have imagined. I figured such an assault could be a small a part of a far bigger strike on adversary nuclear supply automobiles, however Ukraine managed to destroy 34 per cent of the nuclear bomb pressure with an extremely complicated and coordinated operation. That’s wonderful.”

So, what can nations do to guard themselves from related assaults? Broadly, there are three approaches: the bodily, the digital and the kinetic.

The primary sounds easy – simply erect a bodily barrier to maintain drones away. A few of the Russian planes hit by Ukraine had been parked in bays surrounded by protecting concrete blast partitions or earthen banks designed to defend towards close by hearth or explosion, however these don’t cease assaults from above. Russia is now unexpectedly constructing hardened plane shelters, however these are costly, costing thousands and thousands apiece, and are solely sufficiently big for fighters. Bigger strategic bombers are purported to be primarily based away from the entrance strains, out of hazard, and so it was thought they didn’t want defending on this method.

Anti-drone nets are a less expensive different, and one that’s already employed by each Ukraine and Russia on the battlefield. Russian authorities have reportedly suggested airbases to erect such boundaries in response to Ukraine’s assault, however the issue is that such nets are fairly straightforward to take out.

“Netting will present a fairly good defence versus the preliminary UAS [Uncrewed Aerial System] that’s making an assault run,” says Bunker. However drones are so low cost that attackers can merely ship a primary wave in to take out the nets earlier than the remaining proceed to their targets, he says.

What about digital protections? On the entrance strains, each Russia and Ukraine use digital jamming instruments to interrupt radio hyperlinks between drones and their operators. That works to some extent in a battlefield scenario, however as a result of jammers sometimes function at brief vary, an airbase would must be blanketed in them. “They should be deployed and monitored 24/7,” says Bunker.

That creates its personal issues. Operation Spiderweb used industrial cellphone networks, however attackers may use any frequency to manage their drones, and jamming each frequency is probably not an possibility. “Jammers intrude with pleasant indicators too,” says Kallenborn. “To stop such an assault, we might have to simply accept higher threat to pleasant operations.”

As well as, the SBU says its drones had been designed to anticipate jamming and had been fitted with a an AI backup system that guided them to targets with out operator enter. Such drones are primarily proof against jamming,

That leaves kinetic measures, in any other case often called taking pictures down the drones. The Russian airbases had been effectively protected towards typical air assaults with surface-to-air missiles and cellular anti-aircraft models, however these couldn’t detect or have interaction the small drones.

“Such weapons programs want superior acquisition and concentrating on capabilities to have any likelihood of taking down an armed UAS,” says Bunker. “If people are working them, they must be dispersed all through a facility for defensive protection and manned 24/7, which creates an immense personnel and financial burden.”

Automated defences provide a possible answer, and Ukraine is already deploying AI-controlled anti-drone machinegun turrets to guard cities towards Russian assaults utilizing giant Shahed drones. However regardless of costing round $100,000 every, turrets like these might simply be outmatched by the smaller, cheaper drones utilized in Operation Spiderweb. “Massed drones could current a problem,” says Kallenborn.

In brief, there are not any good options – and but, militaries urgently have to discover a solution to mitigate this imminent risk. A US Air Power basic not too long ago advised a Senate committee that there have been over 350 situations of unauthorised drones flying over navy bases contained in the US in 2024 alone. US airbases within the UK have additionally seen related drone incursions.

“Though many are actually simply hobbyists, not less than some are actually adversarial,” says Kallenborn. These adversarial drones are most certainly to be gathering intelligence, relatively than making an attempt an assault – for now, he says. “If we had been at conflict with China, that would change.”

All of which means that a repeat of Operation Spiderweb, whether or not in Russia or elsewhere, is wanting very potential. “This goes effectively past even being a serious vulnerability hole,” says Bunker. “The dyke can’t be plugged. It’s actually crumbling in entrance of us and can quickly burst.”

Subjects: